DCIT-1(2)1, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. PATIL CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue of deduction under Section 80IA to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification. The AO was directed to allow claims for projects that were part of the Settlement Commission's application and disallow claims voluntarily withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing deductions under Section 80IA. The assessee claimed deductions for infrastructure projects, but the AO disallowed them, stating the assessee acted as a contractor and not a developer. The Tribunal considered a co-ordinate bench's order on identical issues for earlier assessment years.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee fulfilled the conditions for claiming deduction under Section 80IA as a developer, or if its role was merely that of a contractor. The eligibility of certain projects for the deduction was also in question.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.69 citing324 ITR 199 · 2010 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH,
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the revenue is against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/ 250/2024-25/1067649828(1) and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024 -25/1067644517(1) dated 14.08.2024 passed against assessment order u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 18.09.2021 and 23.12.2019 for AY 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively.
Grounds taken by the revenue are reproduced as under: ITA Nos. 5907 and 5908/Mum/2025: AY 2017-18 & 2018-19 Patil Construction
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026