DELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 16(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal deleted additions made solely on the basis of AIR/Form 26AS information without supporting evidence. It directed verification for TDS credit and allowed interest under Section 244A as per CBDT circulars. Some grounds were allowed for statistical purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP, appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders concerning disallowances under Section 40(a)(i), additions on payments to retired partners, and additions on professional fees based on un-reconciled Form 26AS data. The appeals also involved claims for TDS credit and interest under Sections 244A and 234D.
What were the issues?
Whether additions based on un-reconciled Form 26AS data are valid without supporting evidence, and whether TDS credit and interest claims are admissible.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Sitaldas Tirathdas146 citing41 ITR 367 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe16 citing190 ITR 198 · 1991 · HC
- S.B. Billimoria & Co. v. ACIT15 citing125 ITD 122 · 2010 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals filed by the assessee are against the orders of CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058263180(1), ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058275393(1), ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058264898(1) and ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058265592
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(i)
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
- DDIT(It)- 1(1), Mumbai vs M/S. American Express Bank Ltd., MumbaiITA 5667/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6198/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026