SCHINELER INDIA PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCITRG 15(3) (2) , MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80JJAA, finding that the necessary documentation was provided. It also directed the AO to grant credit for DDT paid by the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the assessment order concerning international transactions related to license fees, management recharge, and IT support. The assessee also claimed deduction under Section 80JJAA and credit for Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT).
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of transfer pricing adjustments on international transactions, the allowability of deduction under Section 80JJAA due to alleged non-submission of documents, and the credit for DDT paid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 92C,Section 92CA(3),Section 37(1),Section 80JJAA,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the final assessment order passed by National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (NFAC) vide order no. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2021-22/1040015716(1) dated 22.02.2022 u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) pursuant to the directions of ld. Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Mumbai, (DRP) vide order no. ITBA/DRP/F/144C(5)/2021-22/1039079646(1), dated 25.01.2022, passed u/s. 144C(5), for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Grounds taken by assessee are reproduced as under: “Ground I. Legal grounds
2 Schindler India Pvt Ltd. AY 2017-18
On the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026