MATA MUNIYA DEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,SAMALKA, NEW DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), DELHI, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 808/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 May 2025Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication, directing the assessee to furnish the necessary evidences to establish the genuineness of its activity, granting reasonable opportunities.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) for failing to provide requested documentary evidence. The assessee argued they were unable to file the details and requested another opportunity.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) was justified due to non-furnishing of documents, and if a further opportunity should be granted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B),Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “C” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Chhikara, CA
For Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Hearing: 14.05.2025Pronounced: 14.05.2025

ORDER

PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM :

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee seeking to assail the First Appellate order dated 12.12.2024 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [“Ld.CIT(A)”] in Application No.CIT(Exemption),Delhi/2024- 25/12AA/12036 passed u/s 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] pertaining to Assessment Year NA.

2.

At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has challenged the action of the Ld. CIT(E) for rejecting the application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act.

3.

From the perusal of the order, it is seen that the assessee has filed Form 10B for granting registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) is rejected. It is seen that the Ld. CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) as the assessee has failed to provide the details as sought from time to time and thus, the Ld. CIT(E) was of the opinion that the assessee has failed to furnish documentary evidences like financial statement as on 31.03.2024 alongwith audit report, detailed note on charitable activity, property purchased for the construction of school, details of unsecured loan, confirmation letter from creditors, balance sheet of creditors, Copy of ITRS and 26AS for the last three years and bank account statement etc.

4.

Before us, the Ld. AR of the assessee submits that the assessee was not able to file the details before the Ld. CIT(E), however, he requested that assessee may be granted one more opportunity to represent its case before the Ld. CIT(E) to file the documentary evidences as required by Ld. CIT(E).

5.

In reply, the Ld. CIT-DR supported the orders of Ld. CIT(E) and requested for the confirmation of the same.

6.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. It is seen that the Ld. CIT(E) on various occasions asked the assessee to file the details/documents/clarification in support of its claim of registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii). However, the assessee has failed to file any such information before the Ld. CIT(E), thus, the CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act.

7.

Under these facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunities to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to file the necessary evidences before the Ld. CIT(E) in order to establish the genuineness of its activity. With these directions, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

8.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 14.05.2025.

More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B)

All 110 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →