SHRI MAHAVIR AYURVEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION DELHI, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 789/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 May 2025AY 2024-2025Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)5 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the assessee failed to provide required details to the CIT(E) despite multiple opportunities. However, considering the interest of justice, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee trust, which previously had registration u/s 12A and 80G, applied for regular registration. The CIT(E) rejected the application due to the assessee's non-compliance with notices seeking details and documents, including bank statements and the absence of an irrevocable clause in the trust deed.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G for non-compliance, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “C” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Ved Mittal, CA
For Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Hearing: 14.05.2025Pronounced: 14.05.2025

& 789/Del/2025 [Assessment Year : 2024-25] Shri Mahavir Ayurvedic Research vs CIT(Exemption), Institute Social Welfare Trust, Delhi R 52, Gautam Marg, East Vinod Nagar, Delhi-110092. PAN–AAFTS0086D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Ved Mittal, CA Respondent by Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR Date of Hearing 14.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement 14.05.2025 ORDER

PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM :

1.

The captioned appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi (“the Ld. CIT(E)”) dated 27.12.2024 for the Assessment Year 2024-25, whereby application of the assessee for grant of registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (“the Act”) was rejected and also the registration u/s 80G is rejected.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that Shri Mahavir Ayurvedic Research Institute Social Welfare Trust is a trust incorporated on 25.09.2000 and obtained registration u/s 12A and approval u/s 80G on 29.08.2001. Thereafter, an application on 20.06.2024 in Form 10AB for regular registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) was filed. The main objections of the assessee company are religious, relief to the poor, education, medical relief, yoga and preservation of environment and advancement of any other objects of general public utility etc. A questionnaire was issued on 09.07.2024 to provide details, documents or clarification to support the registration claim but the assessee did not comply with. Thereafter, another notice on 09.10.2024 was issued requesting for pending details. In response thereto, the assessee filed part reply. Again another opportunity was provided to the assessee on 11.12.2024 to provide all the requisite pending details/documents. In response thereto, the assessee again filed part reply.

3.

Following discrepancies are noticed while filing the part reply on behalf of the assessee- (a) Bank statement were requisitioned vide letter dated 09.07.2024 for last three Financial years i.e. F.Y 2021-22 to FY 2023-24; and (b) There is no irrevocable clause in Trust Deed provided by the assessee.

4.

In view of the above, the assessee has failed to file above-mentioned details/information required by the notices. However, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee requested that assessee may be granted one more opportunity to represent its case before the Ld. CIT(E) to file pending details/documents as required by Ld. CIT(E).

5.

On the other hand, the Ld. CIT DR supported the orders of Ld. CIT(E) and requested for the confirmation of the same.

6.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. It is seen that the Ld. CIT(E) on various occasions asked the assessee to file the requisite details from time to time. However, the assessee has failed to file any such information before the Ld. CIT(E), thus, the CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G of the Act. Under these facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunities to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to file the necessary evidences before the Ld. CIT(E) in order to establish the genuineness of its activity. With these directions, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)

All 1,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →