KANTILAL DE vs. HIBHAI FULETRA,RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee did not deliberately conceal income but was misguided by his employer, leading to a misconception of law. Therefore, the penalty imposed was cancelled.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a salaried employee, failed to disclose certain interest income due to a misconception that it was exempt. The Assessing Officer (AO) proposed additions, but the assessee had already declared more interest income than proposed by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is leviable when the assessee's failure to disclose income was due to a bona fide misconception of law and not a deliberate concealment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT359 citing348 ITR 306 · 2012 · SC
- M/s Rave Entertainment (P.) Limited v. CIT5 citing376 ITR 544 · HC
- Rave Entertainment P.Ltd. v. CIT3 citing172 ITR 575
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, HON’BLE & SHRI WASEEM AHMED HON’BLE
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, / DR, ITAT, Rajkot 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, / ITAT, Rajkot
Date of dictation- 16/09/2019 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 3. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S.-. … 4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for Pronouncement …….. 5. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk……..… 17/09/2019 6. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk……………………………. 7. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order…………………….. 8. Date of Despatch of the Order………………
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026