THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), SURAT vs. M/S. JAY BHARAT DYEING & PRINTING MILLS PVT. LTD., SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the enhanced monetary limits prescribed by CBDT circulars. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, keeping open the option for the Revenue to file a miscellaneous application if the issue falls under specific exceptions.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT for AY 2009-10. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lacs. The Revenue's representative submitted that the appeal was not maintainable in view of CBDT circulars enhancing monetary limits for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to the tax effect being below the monetary limits specified in recent CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM & SHRI O.P.MEENA, AM ITA No.1608/Ahd/2016 (Assessment Year 2009-10) Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, M/s. Jay Bharat Dyeing & Circle-1(1)(2), Printing Mills P. Ltd. Room No 124, 1st Floor, Aayakar P-216, Kadodara Char Bhavan, Majuragate, Surat-395001. Rasta, Kadodara, Surat- 394327. PAN/GIR No.AAACJ7428C Appellant) .. Respondent) Revenue by Shri B. P. K. Panda (Sr. DR) Assessee by Shri Mehul R. Shah (AR) Date of Hearing 23/09/2019 Date of Pronouncement 23/09/2019 O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH (J.M): This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order of the CIT(A)- 1, Majura Gate, Surat dated 31/03/2016 and it pertains to AY 2009-10. 2. We have heard the Ld. Representative of the parties and perused the record. During course of hearing, ld. DR for the revenue submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal filed by the revenue is less than Rs. 50 lacs and in view of latest CBDT circular No. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018, and also modified circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable and needs to be dismissed. The Ld. DR, further argued that, the issue involved in this appeal is appears to be covered by exception provided under clause (e) of subsequent circular and therefore, if required the revenue shall be allowed to file miscellaneous application to re-call the order. We, find that, the CBDT, recently had issued a circular no. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018, superseding its earlier circular no. 21/2015 and enhanced monetary limit for filing appeal before various appellate authorities and accordingly, enhanced monetary limit to Rs.20,00,000/- for filing appeal before the Tribunal. Further, the board has issued one more circular vide Circular no.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 and enhanced monetary
ITA No1608/Ahd/2016 A.Y.2009-10 limit for filing appeal before appellate Tribunal to Rs. 50,00,000/-. Further, in the said circular, the CBDT had instructed its officer’s to file application for withdrawal of appeal already filed or not to pursue pending appeals. We, therefore, by taking into account the CBDT circular No. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018 and Circular no.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 and also considering the fact that tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than the amount of monetary limit fixed by the CBDT for not filing appeal, dismissed appeal filed by the revenue as not maintainable. We, further noted that the Co-ordinate bench of ITAT, Ahmedabad ‘A’ Bench in ITA. No. 1398/Ahd/2004, vide order dated 14/08/2019 has passed detailed order considering new circular issued by the CBDT and held that except amendment to para 3 of the circular No.3/2018 dated 11/07/2018, all other portions of the circular No.03/2018 (supra) have remain in fact, therefore, this circular is applicable even for pending appeals and accordingly, rejected the arguments of the revenue that the effect of the circular shall come into force from the date of issue of this circular. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also taken note of circulars issued by the CBDT including circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, and also by following the decision of Co-ordinate Bench, we dismissed appeal filed by the revenue as not maintainable. However, we keep open option to the revenue to file a miscellaneous application, if necessary, in case the issues involved in the present appeal comes within 3 exceptions as provided in para 10 of said circular and clause (e) of subsequent circular. 3. In the result, this appeal by the Revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 23/09/2019 Sd/- Sd/- (O. P. MEENA) (AMARJIT SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER सुरत/ Surat, दिन ांक Dated: 23/09/2019/Vijay Pal Singh, Sr.PS
ITA No1608/Ahd/2016 A.Y.2009-10 Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / / TRUE COPY / / Assistant Registrar, Surat
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026