DCIT CIRCLE-3(1), GWALIOR vs. BLUE TELE TECHNOLOGIES P LTD, GWALIOR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, following the CBDT circular which stipulated that appeals with a tax effect of Rs 50,00,000 or less would not be pressed or filed. The Revenue was granted liberty to seek recall if the appeal was inadvertently included.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The CBDT issued a circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs 50,00,000, which was retrospective. The tax effect in this appeal was below this limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the revised monetary limits for appeals set by the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, & DR. M. L. MEENA
PER Dr. M.L. Meena, A.M.: Vide CBDT circular dated 8th August 2019, the income tax department has announced its policy decision not to file, or press, the appeals, before this Tribunal, against the appellate orders favourable to the assessee in the cases in which overall tax effect, including surcharge but excluding interest, is Rs 50,00,000 or less. This monetary limit, which was Rs 20,00,000 till 7th August 2019, has been in effect enhanced by almost 2.5 times over the last year, and the relief is retrospective in
I.T.A No. 361/Agra/2017 2
nature inasmuch as it not only applies to future appeals but also to the pending
appeals.
As a step towards management of litigation, the CBDT has decided to further
enhance the monetary limits for filing the appeals in income tax cases vide para 3
and Para 5 of the aforesaid circular and thus to remove the agony of uncertainty to
the taxpayers who have been successful before the lower appellate authorities. These appeals were heard by this Bench and are being disposed of by this
composite order.
Learned Departmental Representatives state that liberty may be given to
point out, upon necessary further verifications, and to seek recall the dismissal of
appeals and restoration of the appeals in the cases which are inadvertently included in this bunch of appeals, wherein the tax effect, in terms of the CBDT circular
(supra), exceeds Rs 50,00,000. None opposes this prayer; we accept the same. We
make it clear that the appellants shall be at liberty to point out the cases which are wrongly included in the appeals so summarily dismissed, either owing to wrong
computation of tax effect. or owing to such cases being covered by the permissible
exceptions, or for any other reason, and we will take appropriate remedial steps in
this regard.
I.T.A No. 361/Agra/2017 3
In the light of the above discussions, and in the light of the CBDT Circular
dated 11th July 2018, these appeal, involving tax effect of or less than Rs 50 lakhs,
is dismissed as withdrawn.
With the above observations, the appeal filed by the Revenue stand
dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 03/09/2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (Laliet Kumar) (Dr. M.L. Meena) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER *AKV* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT Sr. PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, AGRA
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026