SIDDHARTH M BACCHAWAT,,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(4),, AHMEDABAD

आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद �यायपीठ ‘SMC’ अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2469/Ahd/2017 (�नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2013-14) Siddharth M Bacchawat ITO बनाम/ 2, Manek Atambh Flat Ward-5(2)(4), Vs. Pragati Society Ahmedabad. Navarangpura, Ahmedabad- 380009 �थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ALV PB7 290 F .. (अपीलाथ� /Appellant) (��यथ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� ओर से /Appellant by : None ��यथ� क� ओर से / Aditya Shukla, Sr. DR Respondent by : सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of 08/03/2019 Hearing घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of 12/03/2019 Pronouncement आदेश/O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-7, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A))’ in short), dated 15.01.2016 arising in the assessment order dated 31.03.2014 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning A.Y. 2011-12.

ITA No. 2469/Ahd/17[Siddharth M Bacchawat vs. ITO] A.Y. 2013-14 - 2 - peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the assessee or petition seeking time, it can be presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the appeal filed. Accordingly the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P)Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P.).