M/S. SICA EDUCATION TRUST (REGD.),INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 124/IND/2017Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 January 2019AY 2003-046 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order did not mention or discuss the assessee's contentions and submissions. Therefore, the appeals were set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee, SICA Educational Trust, appealed against the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) for AY 2002-03 and 2003-04. The assessee argued that the CIT(A) did not consider their submissions.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) properly considered the assessee's submissions before passing the appellate order. The core issue revolves around the proper adjudication of grounds of appeal without overlooking assessee's arguments.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: HONBLE KUL BHARAT & HONBLE MANISH BORAD

For Appellant: Shri T.N. Unni & Pavithran
For Respondent: Shri Rajeeb Jain, Sr.DR, Shri T.N. Unni & Pavithran
Hearing: 26.12.2018Pronounced: 02.01.2019

PER MANISH BORAD, AM.

The above captioned two appeals are filed at the instance of

assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2002-03 and 2003-04 and

are directed against the orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax

(Appeals)-II (in short ‘Ld.CIT(A)’], Indore dated 21.11.2016 which is

arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(In

short the ‘Act’) dated 15.02.2015 and 27.03.2006 respectively

framed by ACIT (3)1, Indore. 1

SICA Educational Trust ITA No.123 & 124/Ind/2017 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal;

Assessment Year 2002-03

“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that the utilization of income to the extent of 899.28 sq.m belong to the Association (SICA) which in monetary terms work Rs.38,86,476/- is not proper and in confirming the disallowing the same. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of depreciation amount to Rs.1,94,324/- a consequence to the disallowance of the above claim. 3. The appellant prays to give permission to add, to elaborate, or revised the above grounds of appeal as and when occasion arises. Assessment Year 2003-04

“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs.5,80,020/- as annual value of Rs.4,06,000/- as net income of the six class room. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs.2,74,043/- being the class room furniture and facilities which has been paid by the Trust to the Association (SICA). claim. 3. The appellant prays to give permission to add, to elaborate, or revised the above grounds of appeal as and when occasion arises.

3.

As the issues raised in these appeals are common these were

heard together and being disposed off by this common order for the

sake of convenience and brevity.

SICA Educational Trust ITA No.123 & 124/Ind/2017 4. At the outset Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that Ld.

CIT(A) has not referred to the submissions given by the assessee

during the course of appellate proceedings on various grounds

raised before him and it seems that the contentions of the assessee

have not been considered while deciding the issues raised in

various grounds. He therefore requested for providing one more

opportunity go before the Ld.CIT(A) to get various issues

adjudicated after considering the submissions of the assessee.

5.

Per contra Learned Departmental Representative though

submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) has given finding of fact dealing with

the merits of the issue however he raised no objection if all the

issues raised in both the appeals are set aside to the file of

Ld.CIT(A) for afresh adjudication.

6.

We have heard rival contentions and perused the records

placed before us. We find that the assessee is an educational trust

running schools and is registered as charitable organization u/s

12A of the I.T. Act. Assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act were framed

on 15.2.2005 and 27.3.2006 after making various additions to the 3

SICA Educational Trust ITA No.123 & 124/Ind/2017 income declared by the assessee. In the appeal filed before Ld.CIT(A)

assessee failed to succeed in Assessment Year 2002-2003 and

partly succeeded in the appeal for Assessment Year 2003-04. Now

the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal for both the years.

7.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee has commonly submitted for both

the years that the submissions with regard to the grounds raised

seems not have been considered by Ld.CIT(A) while adjudicating the

issue and one more opportunity was sought to go before the

Ld.CIT(A) for afresh adjudication. The request of Ld. Counsel for the

assessee goes unopposed by Ld. Departmental Representative.

8.

From perusal of the appellate order of the first appellate

authority we find that the Ld.CIT(A) after mentioning the brief facts

in para-1 has reproduced relevant portion of assessment order in

para-2 and then directly decision has been given for each of the

ground in para 3, 4 & 5. Nowhere the contentions and submissions

of the assessee have been mentioned nor have been discussed.

SICA Educational Trust ITA No.123 & 124/Ind/2017 9. We therefore in the given facts and circumstances of the case

are of the considered view that all the issues raised in both the

appeals needs to be set aside to the file of Ld.CIT(A) for afresh

adjudication. Needless to mention that proper opportunity of being

heard should be given to the assessee for providing necessary

submissions and details in support of the grounds raised and the

same will have to be considered by Ld.CIT(A) while adjudicating the

issues so as to pass a speaking order giving reference to the

submissions the assessee.

10.

In the result both the appeals of the assessee pertaining to

Assessment Years 2002-03 & 2003-04 are allowed for statistical

purposes.

The order pronounced in the open Court on 02.01.2019.

Sd/- Sd/-

( KUL BHARAT) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �दनांक /Dated : 2nd January, 2019 /Dev Copy to: The Appellant/Respondent/CIT concerned/CIT(A) concerned/ DR, ITAT, Indore/Guard file. 5

SICA Educational Trust ITA No.123 & 124/Ind/2017

By Order, Asstt.Registrar, I.T.A.T., Indore

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →