ITO, WARD, 1(3), NAGPUR vs. SHRI PURUSHOTTAM VIJAYKUMAR KARWA, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, agreeing that the expenditure was not of an enduring nature and was for a specific tender. The CIT(A) had also noted that the other party had confirmed disclosing their share of income.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 66,37,980/- claimed as administrative expenses by the assessee, holding it to be capital in nature. This expenditure was for the restoration of a cancelled tender for supplying medicine kits.
What were the issues?
Whether the expenditure incurred for restoring a cancelled tender is capital in nature or revenue expenditure. Whether the genuineness and nature of the transaction were adequately proved.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM :
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Mumbai, Camp: Nagpur dated 11-02-2013 for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. The brief facts of the case as emanating from records are : The assessee is engaged in manufacturing and trading of medicines and drugs and trading in shares, futures and options. During the course of scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026