DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR vs. M/S DEBASHU SERVICES PVT.LTD, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer's complete disallowance and the CIT(A)'s partial disallowance were unsustainable. A uniform disallowance of 5% of the commission paid was directed to be made for all assessment years.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a dealer of Kirloskar pumps, paid commission to agents for procuring business. The Assessing Officer disallowed the entire commission, while the CIT(A) granted partial relief. The assessee and Revenue filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the allowability of commission payments made to agents for business procurement. The Tribunal also considered the validity of the Assessing Officer's disallowance and the CIT(A)'s partial relief.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd.897 citing332 ITR 167 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Vodafone Essar South Ltd.86 citing212 Taxmann 184 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- 292 ITR 2829 citing292 ITR 282 · SC
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ukxiqj "यायपीठ, ukxiqj म" । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR "ी डी. क"णाकरा राव, लेखा सद"य एवं "ी िवकास अव"थी, "याियक सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.369/NAG/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010–11 Debashu Services Pvt. Ltd., 18, Saptak Plaza, Shivaji Nagar, Nagpur–440010. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant PAN : AAACD6682J बनाम / V/s. DCIT, Circle–1, ……""यथ" / Respondent Nagpur. आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.259 to 262/NAG/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006–07 to 2008–09 & 2012–13 M/s. Debashu Services Pvt. Ltd., 18, Saptak Plaza, Shivaji Nagar, Nagpur–440010. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant PAN : AAACD6682J बनाम / V/s. DCIT, Circle–1, ……""यथ" / Respondent Nagpur. आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.227 to 230/NAG/2017 ITA Nos.227 to 230/NAG/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006–07 to 2008–09 & 2012–13 DCIT, Circle–1, .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Nagpur. बनाम / V/s. M/s. Debashu Services Pvt. Ltd., 18, Saptak Plaza, Shivaji Nagar, Nagpur–440010. ……""यथ" / Respondent PAN : AAACD6682J Assessee by : Shri C. J. Thakar, Adv. & Shri S. C. Thakar, Adv.
Revenue by : Shri R. K. Baral, Jt.CIT सुनवाई
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026