ITO, WARD- 5 (3), NAGPUR vs. SHREE VENKATASH CASTING PVT. LTD., NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal solely on the grounds of low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The Revenue was granted liberty to seek restoration if exceptions in the circular applied.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made under Section 40A(3) & 40(a)(ia) for transportation charges, and also assailed findings on minor additions. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 Lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, without going into the merits of the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM :
This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Nagpur dated 14-11-2014 for the assessment year 2007-08. 2 ITA No. 62/NAG/2015, A.Y. 2007-08
Shri C.J. Thakar and Shri S.C. Thakar appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted at the outset that the appeal by Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax effect in terms of recent CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, dated 11-07-2018. T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(3)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Saiyed Zaharul Alam, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2233/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- M/S Sadana Electric Store, Lucknow vs DCIT Range-6, LucknowITA 283/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Nagendra Prasad, Patna vs ITO Ward -5(3) Patna, Dak BanglowITA 362/PAT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026