M/S CONSUMER PACKAGING SERVICES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. A.C.I.T. CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for a non-abated assessment, additions can only be made with supporting seized material. Since no such material was found linking to the addition, the assessee's appeal on this legal issue was allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed six appeals against common orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2003-04 to 2008-09. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147, and a disallowance under section 80IB was made without any seized material directly linking to it.
What were the issues?
Whether an addition made during a non-abated assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 is sustainable without any seized or incriminating material directly linking to the addition.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 80IB,Section 131,Section 139
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Paul Brothers164 citing216 ITR 548 · 1995 · HC
- CIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd.92 citing271 ITR 331 · 2004 · SC
- ITO v. Arihant Tiles and Marbles Pvt. Ltd.88 citing320 ITR 79 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- 6 ITR 2076 citing6 ITR 207
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
PER BENCH : There are six appeals under consideration. All these six appeals are filed by the assessee against the common orders of CIT(A)- I, Nagpur dated 28.05.2014 for the different assessment years i.e. Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008–09 respectively. Since the facts heard together and are being disposed of by this composite order.
Since the facts, issues and arguments are common in all these six appeals, therefore, the appeal in ITA No.399/NAG/2014
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026