M/S. LEBEN LABORATORIES PVT. LTD.,AKOLA vs. ACIT, AKOLA CIRCLE, AKOLA, AKOLA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that reopening the assessment based solely on a change of opinion, without any new tangible material, is bad in law. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IB for its pharmaceutical manufacturing units. The original assessment allowed a restricted deduction, but the assessment was reopened to deny it entirely. The assessee challenged the reopening as being based on a mere change of opinion.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid when it was based on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, and whether the denial of deduction under Section 80IB was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Siemens Information System Ltd. v. ACIT & Others49 citing295 ITR 333 · 2007 · HC
- CIT v. Paul Bros.14 citing349 ITR 150 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM :
ITA No. 459/NAG/2013 by the assessee is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Mumbai, Camp : Nagpur dated 05-08-
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026