ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. P S ENTERPRISES, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument that the assessments were invalid. It was held that since the assessment years were "unabated" and no additions were made, the assessments should be quashed.
What were the facts?
The case involves a batch of eight appeals concerning M/s P. S. Enterprises for assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The core issue revolves around the validity of assessments framed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, arising from a search action.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of assessments framed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A when the assessment years were unabated and no additions were made by the lower authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing454 ITR 212 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Naveen Chandra
Heard together (8 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Asstt. Year : 2013-14 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 ITA No. 14/Del/2023 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 DCIT, Vs M/s P. S. Enterprises, Central Circle, 267, Loha Mandi, Bulandshahr Ghaziabad-201002 Road, Ghaziabad-201010 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AACFP8035G Assessee by : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue by : Ms. Nimisha Singh, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 08.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 16.05.2025 ORDER Per Bench: The instant batch of eight appeals pertains to the single assessee herein namely, M/s P. S. Enterprises. All other relevant details thereof stand tabulated as under:
ITA Nos. 2914 to 2917/Del/2022 2 to 14/Del/2023 P. S. Enterprises Sl. A.Y. Respondent Order passed Proceedings No. against u/s 1-2 2013-14 2914/Del/2022 P. S. DCIT CIT(A), Kanpur-4 143(3)/153A Enterprises DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/M/250/20 11/Del/2023 ACIT P. S. 22-23 / Enterprises 1046343707(1) Dated 10.10.2022 3-4 2014-15 2915/Del/2022 P. S. DCIT CIT(A), Kanpur-4 143(3)/153A Enterprises DIN & order No. 12/Del/2023 ACIT P. S. ITBA/APL/M/250/ Enterprises 2022-23 / 1046343793(1) Dated 10.10.2022 5-6 2015-16 2916/Del/2022 P. S. DCIT CIT(A), Kanpur-4 143(3)/153A Enterprises DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/M/250/20 13/Del/2023 ACIT P. S. Enterprises 22-23 / 1046343920(1) Dated 10.10.2022 7-8 2016-17 2917/Del/2022 P. S. DCIT CIT(A), Kanpur-4 143(3)/153A Enterprises DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/M/250/20 14/Del/2023 ACIT P. S. Enterprises 22-23 / 1046347773(1) Dated 10.10.2022
Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused.
Learned counsel submits at the outset that the assessee’s and Revenue’s four cross appeals each i.e. to to 14/Del/2023; for assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17, respectively, involve the first and foremost issue of validity of all the corresponding assessments dated 29.09.2021 framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act arising from the department’s search action dated 30.07.2018 in M/s P. S. Enterprises group of cases.
It is in this factual backdrop that the Revenue could hardly dispute the clinching factual position that all the impugned four assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17, are to 2917/Del/2022 3 to 14/Del/2023 P. S. Enterprises “unabated” ones wherein no addition at all has been made by the learned lower authorities which is based on the specific seized material in light of PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (2023) 454 ITR 212 (SC). We thus see merit in the assessee’s instant first and foremost legal argument to quash all these four assessments dated 29.09.2021 in very terms.
All other pleadings on merit in these cases stand rendered academic.
To sum up, these assessee’s four appeals to 2917/Del/2022 are allowed and Revenue’s as many cross appeals to 14/Del/2023 are dismissed in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026