ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. KROHNE OIL & GAS B.V., GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the appeal of the Revenue deserved to be dismissed in limine due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its subsequent clarification. The circular is binding on tax authorities.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2009-10. The tax effect involved in the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per CBDT circulars, without going into the merits of the case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN CIRCUIT BENCH: DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM
The present appeal is filed by the Revenue against orders dated 26/11/2012 for A.Y. 209-10 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Dehradun.
At the outset, it was brought to our notice that the tax effect involved in the appeal being less than Rs. 50 lacs, squarely falls within the ambit of Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes prescribing the tax effect for preferring appeal before Tribunal by the revenue and subsequent clarification issued by CBDT on 20th August, 2019.
After perusing the materials available on record, we find that the amount disputed before us is below the tax effect limit prescribed by CBDT vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 for preferring appeals before tribunal by the revenue. On perusal of the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 and the materials available on record, Ld. DR could not point out as to how and why such a Circular is not applicable to the facts of the case. We find that the subsequent clarification dated 20.08.2019 makes it very clear that the revised monetary limits shall apply retrospectively to pending appeals also. The Circular is binding on the tax authorities. Hence, we hold that the appeal of the revenue deserve to be dismissed on account of low tax effect vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 and subsequent clarification on 20.08.2019. Accordingly, on account of low tax effect case, we dismiss the appeal of revenue in limine, without going into the merits of the case.
In result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open court at the time of hearing in presence of both the parties on 18.12.2020 Order pronounced in the Open Court on this 18th Day of December, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026