B.D. OVERSEAS AND FISCAL PVT. LTD,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, CIRCLE (1)(1)(2) [CHANGED FROM ITO WARD,MUMBAI], AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. Following precedent, the appeal was dismissed in limine.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was scheduled for a hearing, but neither the assessee nor their representative appeared. No adjournment application was filed despite proper notice being served.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's non-appearance before the Tribunal for the scheduled hearing of their appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-8, Ahmedabad dated 17.10.2016 pertaining to A.Y. 2012-13.
2 . A.Y. 2012-13
On the date of hearing i.e. on 21-10-2019, none appeared on behalf of Assessee nor an adjournment application was filed on behalf of the Assessee though the notice fixing the date of hearing was served on Assessee, which indicates that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, therefore, following the decision of ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of CIT Vs Multiplan India (Pvt.) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. The assessee shall however be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recalling of this order, if prevented by sufficient cause for non-appearance on the date of hearing.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in Open Court on 18 - 11- 2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026