ASSISTSNT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,INDORE 5(1), INDORE vs. M/S TULSIYAN & BALAJI DEVELOPERS, INDORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 661/IND/2017Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 September 2019AY 2012-1322 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the expenses incurred for obtaining a lease deed were in the nature of capital expenditure. Therefore, they could not be allowed as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal also noted that the expenses were not incurred for the purpose of business.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed certain expenses as business expenditure. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, treating them as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.

What were the issues?

Whether expenses incurred for obtaining a lease deed are revenue or capital expenditure. Whether such expenses can be allowed as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 37(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

� Order was pronounced in the open court on 27.09.2019.

� � � (���� � � � (���� ��������,�(=��?*���� ���������#B@��=�*���� ���������?B,��,���C��C*������������&B�����@�C��C*��

[ ] [M/s. Tulsiyan & Balaji Developers, Indore] ������D�����������3���7����!/�"9�!"�9� 67$898� �� ��3�7�����������?�+�����������������������*��-����� $����� ���������� � � � �!!,!$&�$��"-,!$'&'������'"�

More judgments on Section 37(1)

All 6,995 judgments and leading authorities on Section 37(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →