SMT. SHALINI SARDA (MAHESHWARI),BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT 1(1), BHOPAL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 153/IND/2017Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 December 2019AY 2008-09125 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the loans were not genuine and thus taxable as unexplained cash credits. It also upheld the imposition of penalties for concealment of income, finding that the assessee had failed to prove the genuineness of the loans.

What were the facts?

The appeals concerned the taxability of certain amounts and the imposition of penalties. The assessee claimed certain amounts as loans, which the Assessing Officer treated as unexplained cash credits. Penalties were also levied for concealment of income.

What were the issues?

Whether the amounts treated as loans were genuine and whether penalties for concealment of income were rightly imposed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Order was pronounced in the open court on 18.12.2019.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →