JAGDISH MATANHELIA MEMORIAL TRUST,PRATAPGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT had not properly examined the objects of the trust to determine if they were charitable. The CIT also failed to point out any specific non-charitable activity. Therefore, the order of the CIT was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating the trust's activities did not fall under 'education' as charitable purposes.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT properly examined the charitable nature of the trust's objects before rejecting the Section 12A registration application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
PER A. D. JAIN, V.P.: This is assessee’s appeal against the order of the ld. CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow, dated 29/8/2019, refusing grant of registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application for registration under section 12A(1) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 on 14/2/2019 with the CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow. The ld. CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application of the assessee, vide his order dated 29/8/2019, observing that the activities/objects of the applicant do not fall under the limb of ‘education’, as charitable purposes.
Heard. We find that the assessee filed an application for registration under section 12A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 14/2/2019 with the CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow, who rejected the application of the assessee, observing that the activities/objects of the applicant do not fall under the limb of ‘education’, as charitable purposes. The submission of the ld. Counsel for the assessee before us was that the assessee had filed before the ld. CIT(E) all the requisite documents, the copies of which have been filed before us too. We find that in addition to other details, the assessee had furnished before the ld. CIT(A) the brief details of main area of the trust activities [APB:10 & 11] and the objectives of the trust [APB:18]. The ld. CIT (E) had reproduced the details of main area of the trust activities as furnished by the assessee. But he has not examined the objects of the assessee-trust, whether the trust was formed to undertake charitable activities or not. Moreover, the ld. CIT (Exemption), Lucknow has not pointed out any specific activity, which can be said to be a non-charitable activity. It is a settled position of law that while granting registration under section 12A of the Act, the ld. CIT (Exemptions) is required to examine the objects of the assessee. If the objects of the assessee are charitable in nature, registration should be granted to the assessee. It can only be denied, if the ld. CIT (Exemptions) has brought something on record to establish that the assessee was engaged in activities other than charitable ones. This aspect was examined by this Bench of the Tribunal in various cases, wherein, the Tribunal held that while granting registration under section 12A of the Act, the ld. CIT (Exemptions) is required to examine, as to whether the objects of the applicant are of charitable nature or not. In the instant case, the ld. CIT (Exemptions) has not examined the nature of the objects of the trust, but he has denied the registration. Therefore, we set aside the order of the ld. CIT (Exemptions) and restore the matter to his file with a direction to re-adjudicate the issue of grant of registration under section 12A of the Act in the light of the objects of the assessee- trust, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of this order, on affording due opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 13/02/2020.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026