GANGAUR EXPORTS PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the electronic filing of Form 10CCB before the completion of assessment proceedings fulfilled the condition of Rule 12(2) of the IT Rules, especially as prior to the AY 2013-14, electronic filing was not mandatory. The AO was not justified in declining the deduction solely on this ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IA, but the Assessing Officer (AO) declined it because the audit report was not submitted electronically with the return. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's action.
What were the issues?
Whether the deduction under Section 80IA can be denied for non-submission of the audit report electronically with the return when it was filed during assessment proceedings. Whether the filing of Form 10CCB before assessment is sufficient compliance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. G.M. Knitting Industries (P.) Ltd.221 citing376 ITR 456 · 2015 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMA, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 806/JP/2018
ORDER PER: R.C. SHARMA, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 15/03/2018 for the A.Y. 2013-14 in the matter of order passed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act). In this appeal, the assessee has taken sole effective ground, which is as under:
1. The ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur has erred in confirming the addition U/s 80IA amounting to Rs. 35,81,416.00 ignoring the fact that the assessee has filed report U/s 80IA electronically well before the completion the assessment U/s 143(3).
2 ITA 806/JP/2018_ Ganguar Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT 2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. Facts in brief are that the assessee is engaged in manufacturing and export of readymade garments and handicrafts. The assessee has claimed deduction U/s 80 IA for Rs.35,81,416/- in computation of income. As the audit report was not submitted alongwith return of income electronically under Rule 12(2) of the IT Rules, the deduction U/s 80 IA of the Act was declined. By the impugned order, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the A.O., against which the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT.
We have considered the rival contentions and carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below and found from the record that the company has electronically filed Form No. 10CCB for claiming the deduction U/s 80IA for the A.Y. 2013-14 as on 15/03/2016. Prior to the A.Y. 2013-14, the electronic filing of Form 10CCB was not mandatory and form was not required to be enclosed with the return of the income under Rule 12(2) of the Income Tax Rules. As per amended Rule 12(2) the electronic filing of Form 10CCB is mandatory but the due date of filing has not been prescribed. Keeping in view of the above provisions, Form No. 10CCB electronically filed before completion of assessment proceedings fulfils the condition of Rule 12(2) of the IT Rules. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of CIT Vs GM Knitting Industries P. Ltd. Vs AKS Alloys 3 ITA 806/JP/2018_ Ganguar Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT P. Ltd. (2015) 376 ITR 456 (SC) has held that filing of Form 10CCB before the assessment is sufficient compliance of the law.
It is clear from the order of the A.O. that he has declined claim of deduction U/s 80IA of the Act merely on the plea that the audit report was not filed electronically whereas undisputedly the same was filed during the course of assessment proceedings. Thus, there was sufficient compliance with regard to filing of audit report. However, without pointing out any failure of the assessee with regard to fulfilment of conditions prescribed U/s 80IA of the Act, the A.O. was not justified in declining the claim of deduction U/s 80IA of the Act. Since the audit report was already before the A.O. during the scrutiny assessment proceedings, in all fairness, we restore the matter back to the file of the A.O. for deciding the issue of assessee’s eligibility to claim deduction U/s 80IA of the Act as per material placed on record. Needless to say, the assessee should be given due opportunity of hearing before deciding the issue. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only. Order pronounced in the open court on 02nd May, 2019.
¼fot; iky jko½ ¼jes'k lh 'kekZ½ (VIJAY PAL RAO) (RAMESH C SHARMA) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 02nd May, 2019 4 ITA 806/JP/2018_ Ganguar Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Gangaur Exports Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The A.C.I.T., Circle-6, Jaipur. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 806/JP/2018) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026