MANGLA LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, BARODA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that if the firm and the partner are assessed to the same tax rate and the partner has already paid tax on the amount, the addition made in the hands of the assessee should be deleted. The matter was set aside to the AO for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee paid professional fees of Rs. 27,57,500/- to a partner who made extra efforts for the firm's business. The Assessing Officer disallowed this expenditure, and the CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether professional fees paid to a partner for extra efforts can be disallowed, and if so, whether it leads to double taxation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(A)(2),Section 37(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 310 ITR 306 (Bombay) (h) PCIT v. Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd.9 citing60 Taxmann.com 483 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASSEM AHMED
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद । 1.Date of dictation on 28.08.2019 2.Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 29.08.2019 3.Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. P.S./P.S. 05.09.2019 4.Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement 06 .09.2019 5.Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S 06.09.2019 6.Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 06.09.2019 7.Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk…………. 8.The date on which the file goes to the Asstt. Registrar for signature on the order…………………… 9.Date of Despatch of the Order………
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026