M/S.RAJADHANI JEWELLERS,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, WD-2, ALAPPUZHA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal and the Revenue had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee subsequently filed a letter requesting to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal filed before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A), Kottayam passed u/s. 263 of the I.T. Act dated 11/03/2019 and pertain to the assessment year 2014-15.
At the time of hearing, the assessee filed a letter dated 05/11/2019 stating that they do not wish to pursue the appeal filed in the above appeal in passed u/s. 263 of the I.T. Act and sought permission to withdraw the appeal filed for the assessment year 2014-15.
I.T.A. No.391/ Coch2019
The Ld. DR has not made any objection to the withdrawal of the above appeal of the assessee.
In view of the above request of the Ld. AR, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 27th November,2019. sd/- sd/- (GEORGE GEORGE K.) (CHANDRA POOJARI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Place: Kochi Dated: 27th November, 2019GJ Copy to:
1. 1. M/s. Rajadhani Jewellers, Regency Building, Karunagapally P.O., Karunagapally, Kollam-690 518.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026