ALSTOM POWER SYSTEM SA,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the VSVS scheme and the Revenue had no objection to the appeals being disposed of under this scheme. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed against assessment orders for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17. The assessee opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) and filed Form No. 1, but Form No. 2 was not received from the Department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be disposed of as withdrawn consequent to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”, DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17, respectively.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute in the appeals under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (in short ‘VSVS’). Form No. 1 has already been filed for both assessment years i.e. AY 2015- 16 and 2016-17 on 26.12.2024. However, till date Form No. 2 has not been received from the Department. He placed on record copy of Form No. 1 filed by the assessee for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17. Further, the assessee’s declaration under VSVS has not been rejected by the Department till date.
The ld. DR raise no objection in case the assessee’s appeals are disposed of under VSVS.
In light of the statement made by ld. Counsel for the assessee, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty is granted to the assessee to revive appeal(s) in the event application filed by the assessee under VSVS fails to mature. It is further made clear that if the assessee /appellant seeks to restore the appeal in the event assessee’s declaration made under VSVS is not accepted, the Registry shall not insist for filing of application for condonation of delay, if the Miscellaneous Application for recalling the order is filed beyond time on account of delay in communication of outcome under VSVS. [Re. M/s. Nannusamy Mohan(HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A No.372 of 2020 decided on 16/10/2020 by Hon’ble Madras High Court].
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on Monday the 02nd day of June 2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026