ANITA PRITHANI,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-17, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act leads to the deemed withdrawal of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(Appeals). The assessee subsequently filed an application for withdrawal of the appeal due to a settlement under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT is deemed withdrawn upon settlement under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the appellate order dated 16.11.2017 u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 35, New Delhi, being appeal no. 143/15-16 whereby the appeal was dismissed.
Heard and perused the record. An application has been filed, for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee, in furtherance of settlement arrived under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (The Act of 2020).
On behalf of the appellant, from Form 3 under the Act of 2020 with regard to certificate under sub section (1) of Section 5 of the Act of 2020 and Form 4 regarding intimation of payment under sub section (2) of section 5 of the Act of 2020 have been placed on record and the same have not been refuted on behalf of the revenue.
The sub section (2) of section 4 of the Act of 2020 provides that on issuance of certificate under sub section (1) of section 5 by the designated authority the appeal pending before this tribunal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which the said certificate is issued. The same in present case being 01.01.2020, and the intimation of payment being dated 28.04.2021.
In the light of aforesaid, the appeal in hand stands dismissed.
However, subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of The Act of 2020, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application, appropriately as per law.
Order pronounced in the open court on 14/02/2022, immediately after conclusion of the hearing of the matter in virtual mode.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026