EQUATOR ESTATES PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 8(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted to settle the appeal under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and had received Form-3. Consequently, the appeal was treated as infructuous and withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against an order confirming an addition of Rs. 75,00,000 under Section 68 and enhancing income by Rs. 2,25,000 under Section 69C. The assessee claimed to have discharged its onus regarding share application money.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition made under Section 68 for share application money and enhancement under Section 69C were justified. The appeal became infructuous due to settlement under Vivad se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-34, New Delhi, [Ld.
CIT(A)”, for short], dated 28.02.2019 for Assessment Year 2011-12.
Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under: “I. That the Learned CIT (Appeals)-34, New Delhi and the Learned Income Tax Officer, Ward -8(2), New Delhi have not appreciated the facts, circumstances and submissions made in the case fully and correctly. II. The Learned Income Tax Officer, Ward -8(2), New Delhi has erred both in facts and in law in making addition of Rs.75,00,000 u/s 68 by Equator Estate Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO treating amount received toward share application money as unexplained; and the Learned CIT(Appeals)-34, New Delhi, has erred both in facts and in law in confirming the addition of Rs.75,00,000 u/s 68 made by the Learned Assessing Officer and in further enhancing income by Rs.2,25,000 u/s 69C in the appellate order. The appellant company having fully discharged it’s onus u/s 68 in regard to the share capital application money received from M/s Yuwraj Exports Pvt. Ltd. by duly furnishing copies of documents relating to the issue of share capital and copies of the related bank statements to prove the identity of the investor, the nature and genuineness of the transaction, and the creditworthiness of the investor, no addition in regard to the same should have been made u/s 68.”
(B) At the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee, but through a written communication letter dated 14th December, 2021, filed in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal from the assessee’s side, informing that the assessee has opted to settle the aforementioned appeal under Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) and that the Designated Authority has already issued Form-3 under VSVS. We took notice of the aforesaid letter dated 14.12.2021. Copy of Form-3 issued by designated authority under VSVS was also enclosed with the aforesaid letter. Learned Senior Departmental Representative for Revenue submitted before us that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration and in view of the foregoing, we are of the opinion that this appeal has become
Equator Estate Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO infructuous on account of aforesaid VSVS, and this appeal may be treated as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS.
Accordingly, this appeal having become infructuous, is treated as withdrawn and is hereby dismissed.
(B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under this appeal before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal in accordance with law.
(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.
This order was already pronounced orally on 22nd February, 2022 in Open Court, in the presence of Learned Sr.
Departmental Representative, after conclusion of the hearing. Now this order in writing is signed today on 22.02.2022.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026