ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES GROUP ,ETHIOPIA vs. ACIT, INT. TAXATION CIRCLE-1(2)(2), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the receipts were not fees for technical services, distinguishing between a 'service provided' and a 'facility offered'. The lower authorities erred in treating the impugned receipts as FTS.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Ethiopian Airlines Group, received revenue for providing flight simulator and pilot training services to an Indian entity's affiliate. The Indian entity made payments to the assessee, which the Assessing Officer treated as fees for technical services (FTS) taxable in India.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue derived from pilot training services provided by a non-resident to an Indian entity's affiliate constitutes fees for technical services taxable in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd.203 citing67 Taxmann.com 356 · 2016 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. R.D. Aggarwal and Co.156 citing56 ITR 20 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Bharati Cellular Ltd.125 citing392 ITR 186 · 2017 · SC
- GVK Industries Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer119 citing371 ITR 453 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- G.V.K. Industries Ltd. v. ITO41 citing228 ITR 564 · 1997 · HC
- DIT (International Taxation) v. A.P. Moller Maersk AS12 citing246 Taxmann 309 · 2017
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM These assessee’s twin appeals ITA Nos. 2200 & 2201/Del/2024; for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18, arise against Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax [in short, the “ACIT”], Circle- International Taxation-1(2)(2), New Delhi’s as many assessments; framed on 06.03.2024 and 08.03.2024, having DINs & Letter Nos. ITBA/COM/F/17/2023-24/1062121507(1) and ITA Nos. 2200 & 2201/Del/2024
ITBA/COM/F/17/2023-24/1062123964(1); respectively, involving proceedings under section 147 r.ws. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Heard both the parties at length. Cas
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026