INCOM CABLES PRIVATE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT. SPECIAL RANGE-4, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the management program undertaken by the director would improve his management and decision-making skills, ultimately benefiting the assessee's business. Therefore, the expenditure was considered allowable.
What were the facts?
The assessee company debited Rs. 19,76,700/- as 'Staff Training Expenses' for a course undertaken by its director at Harvard Business School. The Assessing Officer disallowed this expense, considering it personal. The CIT(A) also sustained this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the expenditure incurred on a management program for a director constitutes an allowable business expense or a personal expense.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AM ALANKAMONY & SH. YOGESH KUMAR U.S.
ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JM
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 07/09/2017 passed by the CIT(A)-35, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2014-15.
The brief facts of the case are that, assessee is a Company engaged in business of manufacturing cables and filed its return of income on 28/11/2014 as per normal provisions of Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the return was revised on the same day declaring total income of Rs. 4,42,40,090/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued to the assessee, the assessee has participated in the assessment proceedings through his representative and requisite details were filed.
The assessment order has been passed on 25/11/2016 against the assessee by computing the total income of the assessee at Rs. 5,06,19,060/- as against the returned income of Rs. 4,42,40,090/- in following manners:-
Income as declared by the assessee Rs. 4,42,40,090/- Additions 1. Disallowance out of tour & travel expenses Rs. 39,02,268/- 2 Disallowance of Staff training expenses Rs. 19,76,700/- 3. Disallowance out of repair and maintenance Rs. 5,00,000/- expenses Total Income Rs. 5,06,19,058/- Rounded off Rs. 5,06,19,060/-
As against the assessment order dated 25/11/2016, the assessee has preferred an appeal before CIT (A)-35, New Delhi. The Ld. CIT(A) has partially allowed the travelling allowances of Directors and restricted the addition to Rs. 28,97,907/-, allowed the allowances of Rs. 5,00,000/- out of domestic travelling expenses, allowed repair and maintenance expenses of Rs. 5,00,000/- and sustained disallowance of “Staff Training Expenses” of Rs. 19,76,700/-, thereby the CIT(A) has partly allowed the appeal vide dated 07/09/2017.
Aggrieved by the order dated 07/09/2017 passed by CIT(A) the assessee is before us on following ground:-
“1 That the action of the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-35, New Delhi by confirming the action of Assessing Officer regarding disallowing the staff training expenses amounting to Rs. 19,76,700/- is unjust, arbitrary and against the natural law and justice.”
The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that, a sum of Rs. 19,76,700/- has been debited from assessee Company as ‘Staff Training Expenses’ in P & L account, which has been paid to Hardward Business School and Management for a course of assessee’s Director, who was looking after the functioning of the assessee. Further, it submitted that, the said course undergone by the director has contributed to the development of the business. Therefore, contended that the said amount is allowable expenses of the assessee under ‘Staff Training Expenses’.
Per contra, the Ld. DR vehemently contended that, the said expenditure is in the nature of personal expenses and the assessee has not substantiated the nexus of expenditure incurred with the business of the Assessee Company. Further relied on the reasoning and the conclusion of the assessment order and the order of the CIT(A), submitted that no interference is called for by this Tribunal.
We have heard the Ld. Counsel Sh. Kunal Malhotra, for appellant and Ld. Sr. DR Smt. Princy Singhla, for the Revenue, perused the records and gave our thoughtful consideration. In the present case, there is no dispute that the Director of the assessee Company who was looking after the functioning of the assessee Company, has joined to the course in Harward Business School and Management and the assessee Company has incurred the expenditure of Rs. 19,76,700/-. The said amount has been debited from assessee’s company as “Staff Training Expenses” in the P & L Account. The said expenditure which was incurred by the Company has been paid to Hardward Business School and Management for a management program i.e. “Owner/President Management Program, Batch No. 47” of assessee’s Director Mr. Raghav Sharma, who was looking after the functioning of the assessee, the said course is in advanced management.
We find that, on undergoing such “Owner/President Management Program” course by a director of a company will certainly improves the management skill and decision making skill and also add to the competence as the Director of a company. Since the said director who was looking after the management of the Assessee, such Management program course will result in improvement of the management skill of the director and the such skill and experte acquired by the Director in the said course will ultimately of the use and benefit in day to day business of the assessee. The assessee is engaged in business of manufacturing cables, using such skill and experte acquired by the Director in the said course will ultimately improves the efficiency and productivity of assessee. Therefore, in our opinion the said amount of Rs.19,76,700/- is allowable expenses under the provisions of the Act. Accordingly, we allow the grounds taken by the assessee.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026