INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3-2, JAIPUR vs. SILVER SAND BUILDERS PVT. LTD., JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding the reassessment invalid because the AO lacked valid reasons for reopening after four years without evidence of the assessee's failure to disclose fully. The Tribunal also ruled that the annual letting value of the property should be Nil due to its unauthorized construction and inability to be let out.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened assessments for three years to tax unsold closing stock of a commercial complex as income from house property, following a Delhi High Court decision. The CIT(A) quashed the reassessment proceedings, finding the reopening invalid.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated after four years without alleging failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly. Whether the annual letting value of unsold stock in an unauthorized construction can be taxed as income from house property.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 139(1),Section 22,Section 23(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.208 citing354 ITR 180 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- Mrs. Shiela Kaushish v. CIT64 citing131 ITR 435 · 1981 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Smt. Prabhabati Bansali36 citing141 ITR 419 · 1983 · HC
- Deewan Daulat Rai Kapoor v. NDMC35 citing122 ITR 700 · 1980 · SC
- CIT v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.33 citing393 ITR 264 · 2007 · HC · Read judgment
- Kartikeya International v. CIT33 citing329 ITR 539 · 2010 · HC
- M.V. Sonavala v. CIT27 citing177 ITR 246 · 1989 · HC
- 67 DTR 3563 citing67 DTR 356 · HC
- 95 Taxmann.com 173 citing95 Taxmann.com 17 · 2018 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCH ‘B’, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
The Appellant- The ITO Ward 3(2), Jaipur.
The Respondent – M/s. Silver Sand Builders Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur. 3. The CIT(A). 4. The CIT, 5. The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 1240, 1241 & 1242/JP/2018) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026