ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI MANISH PERIWAL, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals were not maintainable as the tax effect was below the monetary limit specified in the CBDT circular. Therefore, the appeals could not be filed by the department.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed multiple appeals before the ITAT. The Departmental Representative submitted that these appeals were covered by a CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the departmental appeals were maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect and the CBDT circular on monetary limits for appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Yogesh Kumar US
Heard together (11 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Bench:
At the outset, the ld. DR submitted that the appeals have been covered by the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the CBDT issued in supersession of earlier instructions has directed that department’s appeals before ITAT shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lacs. The tax will not include any ITA Nos.5544, 5545, 5546, 5548 & 6071 to 6075/Del/2016 2 & ITA No. 2791/Del/2018 Manish Periwal interest thereon. It is further clarified that even if in the case of an assessee, disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal cannot be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit so specified.
Admittedly, in the departmental appeal, the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lacs, therefore, departmental appeal is not maintainable.
In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 20/04/2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026