ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, KOTA vs. M/S ZYDEN GENTEE LTD., KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect did not exceed the revised monetary limit for filing appeals by the department. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Department filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A). The tax effect in the appeal was calculated to be less than Rs. 50,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Department was maintainable considering the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAMESH C. SHARMA, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 721/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh jes’k lh0 ’kekZ] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Jh fot; iky jko] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI RAMESH C. SHARMA, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 721/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2013-14 cuke The ACIT, M/s Zyden Gentee Ltd., Vs. Circle-1 143 Deepshree Building Gumanpura, Kota. Kota. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAACZ 2189 G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Ms Anuradha (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: None lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2019 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 21/08/2019 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. This appeal by the Department is directed against the order dated 12.03.2019 of ld. CIT(A), Kota for the assessment year 2013-14. As per the grounds of appeal, the tax effect calculated by the AO in respect of the relief granted by the ld. CIT (Appeals) which has been challenged in the present appeal is less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. ACIT vs. M/s Zyden Gentee Ltd.
We have heard the ld. D/R and considered the relevant material on record. At the outset, we note that the tax effect in this appeal is not exceeding the monetary limit as revised by the CBDT vide Circular dated 08.08.2019 for the purpose of filing of appeal by the department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal from Rs. 20,00,000/- to Rs. 50,00,000/-. For ready reference, we reproduce the CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 as under :-
Further Enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court - Amendment to Circular 3 of 2018 - Measures for reducing litigation.
Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July 2018 has been replaced by Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August 2019 to enhance Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court for reducing litigation.
Appeals/SLPs in Income- Monetary Limit Monetary Limit tax matters (Rs.) (previous (Rs.) limit) (Revised Limit) Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000 50,00,000 Before High Court 50,00,000 1,00,00,000 Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000 2,00,00,000
• The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the 2 ACIT vs. M/s Zyden Gentee Ltd. case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit. • Further, even in the case of composite order of any High Court or appellate authority which involves• more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit. • In case where a composite order/ judgment involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be• dealt with separately.”
Accordingly, the appeal of the department is not maintainable being monetary limit is less than/not exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-.
The department is at liberty to file the Miscellaneous Application in case the tax effect in this appeal is found to be more then Rs. 50,00,000/- or the case falls in any of the exceptions of the circular.
In the result, appeal of the department is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21/08/2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026