What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, appeals with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit should be dismissed. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2014-15. The tax effect of the relief granted by the CIT(A) was less than Rs. 50.00 lacs.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to the tax effect being below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

ACIT vs M/S Rashleela Enterprises | ITAT Jaipur 2019

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR

Before: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMA, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM

Hearing: 20/08/2019Pronounced: 21/08/2019

vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 404/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2014-15 cuke A.C.I.T., M/s Rashleela Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Circle-1, C-5, Krishna Balram, Malviya Jaipur. Nagar, Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No. AADCR 2594 J vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by: Ms. Anuradha (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: Shri Rohan Sogani & Ms. Shivangi Samdhani (CAs) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2019 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@ Date of Pronouncement : 21/08/2019 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: R.C. SHARMA, A.M. The appeal by the revenue is directed against the order dated 03/01/2018 of ld. CIT(A)-I, Jaipur for the A.Y. 2014-15 in the matter of order passed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act).

As per grounds of appeal, tax effect in respect of relief granted by the ld. CIT(A) works out to be less than Rs. 50.00 lacs, therefore, in view of the CBDT circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 this appeal deserves to be dismissed.

2 ACIT Vs M/s Rashleela Enterprises 3. CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 reads as under:- Further Enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court - Amendment to Circular 3 of 2018 - Measures for reducing litigation. Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July 2018 has been replaced by Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August 2019 to enhance Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court for reducing litigation. Appeals/SLPs in Income- Monetary Limit Monetary Limit tax matters (Rs.) (previous (Rs.) limit) (Revised Limit) Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000 50,00,000 Before High Court 50,00,000 1,00,00,000 Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000 2,00,00,000  The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit.  Further, even in the case of composite order of any High Court or appellate authority which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit.  In case where a composite order/ judgment involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be dealt with separately.”

Since the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 lacs, the appeal of the revenue deserves to be dismissed. Before parting with the matter, it is 3 ACIT Vs M/s Rashleela Enterprises made clear that the department is at liberty to file Misc. application, if the tax effect is found to be more than Rs. 50.00 lacs or the case falls in any of the exceptions of the circular.

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 21st August, 2019.

Sd/- Sd/- ¼fot; iky jko½ ¼jes'k lh 'kekZ½ (VIJAY PAL RAO) (RAMESH C SHARMA) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 21st August, 2019 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant-The A.C.I.T., Circle-1, Jaipur. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- M/s Rashleela Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., 2. Jaipur. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए 5. Jaipur xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 404/JP/2018) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR vs. M/S RASHLEELA ENTERPRISES, JAIPUR

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments