ACIT, AJMER vs. SHIV PRAKASH BAJAJ, BHILWARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect in the appeal did not exceed the revised monetary limit of Rs. 50,00,000/- for filing appeals by the department. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Department filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2009-10. The tax effect calculated by the AO was less than Rs. 50 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Department's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal considering the revised monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCH ‘A’ JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 351/JP/2017
jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri J. C. Kulhari (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assessee by : Shri Saurav Harsh (Adv.) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20.08.2019 ?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@ Date of Pronouncement : 21.08.2019 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This appeal by the department is directed against the order dated 23.02.2017 of ld. CIT (A)-2, Udaipur for the assessment year 2009-10. As per the grounds of appeal
, the tax effect calculated by the AO in respect of the relief granted by the ld. CIT (A) which has been challenged in the present appeal is less than Rs. 50 lacs.
2. We have heard the ld. D/R as well as the ld. A/R. At the outset, we note that the tax effect in this appeal is not exceeding the monetary limit as revised by the CBDT vide Circular dated 08.08.2019 for the purpose of filing of appeal by the department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal from Rs. 20,00,000/- to Rs. ACIT, Ajmer vs. Shri Shiv Prakash Bajaj, Bhilwara 50,00,000/-. For ready reference, we reproduce the CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 as under :-
Further Enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court - Amendment to Circular 3 of 2018 - Measures for reducing litigation.
Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July 2018 has been replaced by Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August 2019 to enhance Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court for reducing litigation. Appeals/SLPs in Income- Monetary Limit (Rs.) Monetary Limit (Rs.) tax matters (previous limit) (Revised Limit) Before Appellate 20,00,000 50,00,000 Tribunal Before High Court 50,00,000 1,00,00,000 Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000 2,00,00,000 • The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit. • Further, even in the case of composite order of any High Court or appellate authority which involves• more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit. • In case where a composite order/ judgement involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be• dealt with separately.”
Accordingly, the appeal of the department is not maintainable being monetary limit is less than/not exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-. -JP-2017 ACIT, Ajmer vs. Shri Shiv Prakash Bajaj, Bhilwara 3. The department is at liberty to file the Miscellaneous Application in case the tax effect in this appeal is found to be more then Rs. 50,00,000/- or the case falls in any of the exceptions of the circular. 4. In the result, appeal of the department is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21/08/2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026