SHRIMATI MEERA AGGARWAL,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the period of lockdown due to the pandemic should be excluded when calculating the 90-day period for pronouncement of orders. The appeal was partly allowed based on these observations.
What were the facts?
During a search, cash deposits of Rs. 6,85,000/- were found in the assessee's bank account, claimed as tuition income, and jewellery worth Rs. 18,61,200/- was found, claimed as received during marriage. The Assessing Officer treated both as unexplained income.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of the assessment under Section 153A and the addition of unexplained cash credits and jewellery. The judgment also discusses the interpretation of time limits for pronouncements during lockdown.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 69B,Section 292C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Bhaichand H. Gandhi237 citing141 ITR 67 · 1983 · HC
- Otters Club v. DIT202 citing392 ITR 244 · 2017 · HC
- Shivsagar Veg Restaurant v. ACIT202 citing317 ITR 433 · 2009 · HC
- Smt. Manshi Mahendra Pitkar v. ITO 1(2), Thane41 citing73 Taxmann.com 68 · 2016 · ITAT
- Isha Beevi v. TRO25 citing101 ITR 449 · 1975 · SC
- Smt. Madhu Raitani v. ACIT16 citing10 Taxmann.com 206 · 2011 · HC
- Mehul v. Vyas Vs. ITO7 citing764 ITD 296 · 2017 · ITAT
- Smt. Huma Hussain v. CIT3 citing291 ITR 475 · 2007 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood
आदेश आदेश क� आदेश आदेश क� क� �ितिल�प क� �ितिल�प �ितिल�प अ�े�षत �ितिल�प अ�े�षत अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अ�े�षत 1. अपीलाथ� अपीलाथ� / The Appellant अपीलाथ� अपीलाथ� 2. ��यथ� ��यथ� / The Respondent. ��यथ� ��यथ� 3. आयकर आयु� आयकर आयु�(अपील अपील) / The CIT(A)- आयकर आयकर आयु� आयु� अपील अपील 4. आयकर आयकर आयु� आयकर आयकर आयु� आयु� / CIT आयु� 5. DR, ITAT, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar 6. गाड� गाड� फाईल गाड� गाड� फाईल फाईल / Guard file. फाईल स�या�पत स�या�पत स�या�पत �ित स�या�पत �ित �ित //True Copy// �ित
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026