What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee subsequently filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' to settle the matter.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Smt. Sanju Sarda C/O- Laxmi… vs ITO | ITAT Jaipur 2019

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR

Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 787/JP/2019

Hearing: 12/03/2021Pronounced: 12/03/2021

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 787/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2014-15 cuke Smt. Sanju Sarda, ITO, Vs. Prop. M/s Laxmi Minerals, Ward, RICCO Industrial Area, Dausa Dausa ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGBPS2978Q vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: (withdrawal application filed) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 12/03/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 12/03/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)- 22, Alwar dated 25.03.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.

The ld A/R has stated that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has been accepted and Form 3 has been issued on 31.01.2021 by the Designated Authority and which has been received by the assessee. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Smt. Sanju Sarda, Dausa vs. ITO, Dausa 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.

In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/03/2021.

SMT. SANJU SARDA C/O- LAXMI MINERALS, RICCO INDUSTRIAL AREA, DAUSA,DAUSA vs. ITO WARD, DAUSA, WARD, DAUSA

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Recent GST High Court judgments