M/S WIZARD BIOTECH PVT LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order passed by the AO. The matter was restored to the AO to decide afresh after considering the documents filed by the assessee, ensuring a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made a 100% addition on purchases from M/s Span Enterprises, alleging them to be bogus. The assessee denied these purchases and provided VAT returns showing no such transactions.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO's ex parte assessment order was passed without providing an opportunity of hearing and if the addition on account of alleged bogus purchases was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC
Before: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMAvk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1055/JP/2019
ORDER PER: R.C. SHARMA, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 30/03/2016 for the A.Y. 2009-10 in the matter of order passed U/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act).
In this appeal, the assessee is basically aggrieved for the ex parte order passed by the A.O. without giving opportunity and also for merit of the addition so made in respect of purchases which was alleged to be bogus.
I have considered the rival contentions and carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below. From the record, I found that the A.O.
2 ITA 1055/JP/2019 M/s Wizard Biotech (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT has made 100% addition in respect of purchases made from M/s Span Enterprises, Mumbai amounting to Rs. 13,09,500/-. It is the contention of the ld AR that AO has passed the impugned assessment order based on general information received from the office of Commercial Taxes Department (CTD), Maharastra wherein CTD has contended that one M/s. Span Enterprises, Mumbai has issued sale bill of Rs.1309500/- to the assessee whereas the assessee from initiation of proceedings has denied to make any such purchases from M/s. Span Enterprises, Mumbai. That the assessee has got issued certified copy of the reasons recorded by the AO vide application submitted in office of ACIT, Circle-4, Jaipur on dated11.11.2019, copy of which are annexed in Paper Book.
It was further argued that the assessee was registered under Maharastra VAT Act having TIN-27750012485V and copy of all these VAT Returns and wherein there is no such purchase transaction have been shown in these returns during the financial year 2008-09 which stipulates the details of purchases made during the year by the assessee and which is submitted with the Commercial taxes department to get benefit of Input tax credit (ITC) and otherwise there would have been loss of Input tax credit (ITC) to the assessee. Thus, on perusal of these VAT Returns it is 3 ITA 1055/JP/2019 M/s Wizard Biotech (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT crystal clear that there is no such entry falling to have made purchase from M/s. Span Enterprises, Mumbai and then how the same may be treated to have been made as purchases is absolutely illegal and unjustified in the facts and circumstances of the case. Copy of all these VAT Returns are annexed herewith in Paper Book.
After going through the documents placed on record, I set aside the ex parte order passed by the A.O. and the matter is restored back to him for deciding the issue afresh after considering the documents filed by the assessee before the ITAT. The assessee is also directed to file all these documentary evidences before the A.O. to facilitate for passing of the fresh order in accordance with law. Needless to say, assessee be provided reasonable opportunity of hearing.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026