SH. SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA (HUF),LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-2(3), LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and fulfilled the requirements.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and filed the necessary forms. The Income Tax Department issued Form 3 under the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if the assessee opts for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld.
CIT(A)-1, Ludhiana dated 28.08.2018.
The ld. counsel for the assessee furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
Sub: Request for withdrawal of appeal as filed vide ITA No. 1363/CHD/2018
With regard to the captioned subject, it is very humbly submitted that for the A.Y 2013- 14, the Appellant has opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and had filed Form 1 & 2 with Worthy PCIT, ludhiana on 21.05.2020. The Worthy PCIT-I, Ludhiana has also issued Form 3 dated 25.06.2020 as per copy enclosed and now the Appellant is required to file Form 4 along with the evidence of withdrawal of appeal. Thus, in view of the above, it is requested before your goodself to kindly allow the appellant to withdraw the appeal filed with Hon'ble ITAT. Thanking You Yours Faithfully
ITA 1363/CHD/2018 A.Y. 2013-14 2
For M/s Sanjay Kumar Gupta HUF Sd/- Sanjay Kumar (Karta)”
During the course of hearing the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing Certificate No. 367188820250620, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The ld. Sr. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 30.07.2020
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026