MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 6(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3816/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 May 2022AY 2005-063 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee requested withdrawal of its appeal due to a resolution reached under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) concerning transfer pricing adjustments. The MAP resolution provided relief for the assessment year 2005-06.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on a MAP resolution that provided relief for transfer pricing adjustments.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Article 27 of India-USA Double Tax Avoidance Agreement

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “I-1”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, Advocate, Ms. Deepika Aggarwal, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, CIT- DR
Hearing: 04.05.2022

The appeal of the assessee is preferred against the order dated 14.12.2016 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi pertaining to the assessment year (“AY”) 2005-06.

2.

The Ld. AR for the assessee, vide letter dated 13.04.2022 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee’s associated enterprise (“AE”) in the United States of America (“USA”), namely Microsoft Corporation had filed an application under Mutual Agreement Procedure (“MAP”) before USA Competent Authority to resolve the dispute relating to determination of arm’s length price for the transfer pricing adjustment made in the assessment order dated 17.11.2008 under Article 27 of India-USA Double Tax Avoidance Agreement . The assesee has received a copy of the communication issued by the Indian Competent Authority on 04.04.2022 informing the assessee about the resolution under MAP proceedings for the A.Y 2005-06. The MAP resolution has specified relief to be granted on account of transfer pricing adjustments in relation to the assessee’s AE i.e Microsoft Corporation. Since the assessee has opted for acceptance of the aforesaid MAP resolution, the assessee wishes to withdraw all the grounds of appeal raised in the captioned appeal ( A.Y 2005-06.

3.

Ld. CIT(DR) has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →