ZSCALER, INC.,UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Indian subsidiary did not have the authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the assessee and was not habitually engaged in securing orders. Therefore, it did not constitute a DAPE under the India-USA DTAA.
What were the facts?
Zscaler Inc., a US-based company providing software-based information security solutions, filed its Indian tax return declaring 'Nil' income, claiming exemption under the India-USA DTAA. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that its Indian subsidiary, Zscaler Softech India Pvt. Ltd., constituted a Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment (DAPE) in India.
What were the issues?
Whether the Indian subsidiary of a foreign company constitutes a Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment (DAPE) under the India-USA DTAA, and consequently, whether the foreign company's income is taxable in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Article 5(4), Article 7, Section 10(50)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT914 citing125 Taxmann.com 42 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT v. Morgan Stanley Co. Inc.162 citing399 ITR 34 · 2017 · SC
- Bharti Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT46 citing160 Taxmann.com 12 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- 237 CTR 438 (Del), DIT v. Nokia Networks OY11 citing182 ITD 479 · 2020 · ITAT
- Delhi HC in Rolls Royce Singapore (P) Ltd. v. ADIT10 citing347 ITR 192 · 2012 · HC
- DIT (International Taxation) v. Morgan Stanley & Co.5 citing284 ITR 260 · 2006
- DIT v. Western Union Financial Services Inc.4 citing472 ITR 220 · 2025 · HC
- DAPE. Then in SFDC Ireland v. CIT3 citing171 Taxmann.com 731 · 2025
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: D : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, CCOUNTANT MEMBER
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These appeals are preferred by the Assessee against the final assessment orders dated 31.10.2023 and 22.01.2025 passed by the Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, International Tax Circle 3(1)(1), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO) u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AYs 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively. Since the issues are common appeal, for AY 2021-2022 is considered lead year appeal and facts or orders wherever relevant are picked or referred from appeal for AY 2021-2022.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026