SUDTRAC LINKAGES PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-24(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 9390/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 June 2022AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek restoration if the VSV scheme benefits could not be availed for bonafide reasons.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2013-14. The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted to avail benefits under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn due to their opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

None mentioned

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 21/06/2022

आदेश/O R D E R

PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM:

1.

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, New Delhi (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 27.09.2019 concerning AY 2013-14.

2.

The captioned assessee has sought to withdraw the appeal listed above on the ground that assessee has opted to avail benefits of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (VSV). As per letter filed by assessee, it is submitted that assessee does not seek to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and consequently requested that assessee’s application for withdrawal of appeal may please be granted.

3.

The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

4.

In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

This Order pronounced on 21/06/2022

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →