SHRI SURENDRA KUMAR MATHUR,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SIKAR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' petition was accepted. The Revenue did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2013-14. The assessee later filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' for settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal filed before the ITAT due to settlement under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 429/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 429/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2013-14 cuke Shri Surendra Shankar Mathur, The ITO, Vs. A-60/104, Shivangan Rajat Path, Ward-1, Mansarovar, Jaipur. Sikar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACOPM 8015 H vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : None jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Manisha Choudhary (ACIT) a lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 21/01/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 21/01/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M.
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)-IV, Jaipur dated 28.01.2019 for the assessment year 2013-14.
None has appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has moved an application dated 23.12.2020 stating that he has submitted a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has recently been accepted and Form 3 has been issued by the competent authority. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal.
The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026