NITIN AGGARWAL (HUF),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-35(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8708/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 July 2022AY 2011-124 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision. This was done to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to be heard, as agreed by both parties.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer passed an assessment order under section 153A, determining the assessee's income at Rs. 23,61,265 against a returned income of Rs. 2,02,490, adding Rs. 21,58,775 as undisclosed business income. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order in violation of natural justice. Whether the assessee was provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153A,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Shri Aman Garg, Adv

ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019 of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] for Assessment Year 2011-12.

(B) In this case, assessment order was passed by the Assessing Officer (“AO” for short) on 28.12.2019 u/s 143(3) read Nitin Aggarwal (Huf) vs. ACIT with section 153A of Income Tax Act, wherein the assessee’s income was determined at Rs.23,61,265/- (Rounded off to Rs.23,61,270) as against returned income of Rs.2,02,490/-. In the aforesaid assessment order an amount of Rs.21,58,775/- was added to the assessee’s returned income, on account of undisclosed business income. The assessee’s appeal against aforesaid assessment order was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019. Now this present appeal has been filed by the assessee in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT” for short) against the aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019 of Ld. CIT(A).

(C) At the time of hearing before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently contended that the Ld. CIT(A) passed an ex- parte order without giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee, in clear violation of principle of natural justice. He submitted that the issue in dispute in the present appeal may be set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Departmental Representative (“Ld Nitin Aggarwal (Huf) vs. ACIT CIT-DR” for short) was in agreement with the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. In view of the foregoing, and as representatives of both sides, Ld. Counsel for assessee as well as Ld. CIT-DR for Revenue; are in agreement, we set aside the impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019 of the Ld. CIT(A) and set aside all the matters in dispute to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for fresh order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. This appeal is thus disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid directions.

(D) In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal is partly allowed.

This order was already pronounced orally on 30th June, 2022 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of hearing. Now, this written order in writing is signed today on 01/07/2022.

More judgments on Section 153A

All 18,957 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →