NITIN AGGARWAL (HUF),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-35(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision. This was done to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to be heard, as agreed by both parties.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer passed an assessment order under section 153A, determining the assessee's income at Rs. 23,61,265 against a returned income of Rs. 2,02,490, adding Rs. 21,58,775 as undisclosed business income. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order in violation of natural justice. Whether the assessee was provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019 of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] for Assessment Year 2011-12.
(B) In this case, assessment order was passed by the Assessing Officer (“AO” for short) on 28.12.2019 u/s 143(3) read Nitin Aggarwal (Huf) vs. ACIT with section 153A of Income Tax Act, wherein the assessee’s income was determined at Rs.23,61,265/- (Rounded off to Rs.23,61,270) as against returned income of Rs.2,02,490/-. In the aforesaid assessment order an amount of Rs.21,58,775/- was added to the assessee’s returned income, on account of undisclosed business income. The assessee’s appeal against aforesaid assessment order was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019. Now this present appeal has been filed by the assessee in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT” for short) against the aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019 of Ld. CIT(A).
(C) At the time of hearing before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently contended that the Ld. CIT(A) passed an ex- parte order without giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee, in clear violation of principle of natural justice. He submitted that the issue in dispute in the present appeal may be set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Departmental Representative (“Ld Nitin Aggarwal (Huf) vs. ACIT CIT-DR” for short) was in agreement with the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. In view of the foregoing, and as representatives of both sides, Ld. Counsel for assessee as well as Ld. CIT-DR for Revenue; are in agreement, we set aside the impugned appellate order dated 30.09.2019 of the Ld. CIT(A) and set aside all the matters in dispute to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for fresh order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. This appeal is thus disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid directions.
(D) In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal is partly allowed.
This order was already pronounced orally on 30th June, 2022 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of hearing. Now, this written order in writing is signed today on 01/07/2022.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026