M/S. SIWAL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, 98, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, KOTA,KOTA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, KOTA, CIRCLE-1, KOTA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as it was pending before the Hon'ble Bench as on January 31, 2020, and the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for Assessment Year 2010-11. The assessee subsequently filed an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible to withdraw the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 900/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Kota dated 28/03/2019 for the A.Y. 2010-11.
The hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee furnished application for withdrawal of this appeal. The contention made in the said application reads as under: “It is most humbly submitted that the quantum appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2010-11 is pending before the Hon'ble Bench in ITA No: 900/JP/19.
2 ITA 900/JP/2019_ M/s Siwal Builders & Developers vs ACIT It is submitted that the Hon'ble Finance Minister in her budget speech of 2020 announced a dispute resolution scheme Vivad Se Vishwas. The scheme was formulated into The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV) on 17th March, 2020. The Act provides that any assessee whose appeal was pending as on 31st January, 2020 can settle his dispute by filing a declaration u/s 4(1) of DTVSV in Form-1 and Form-2. The above mentioned appeal was pending as on 31stJanuary, 2020.The appeal has not been decided till date, therefore, the assessee is eligible for opting the scheme. The assessee filed declaration in Form-1 and Form-2. On 28th January, 2021, the assessee received Form-3 i.e. Form for Certificate u/s 5(1) of DTVSV from Designated Authority. Section 4(2) of DTVSV, provides that where declaration has been filed by the assessee the appeal shall be deemed to be withdrawn from the date on which Certificate u/s 5(1) of DTVSV is issued by the Designated Authority. Hence, in the present case, the appeal of the assessee stands withdrawn on 28th January, 2021. In view of above you are requested to kindly treat the appeal of the assessee to be withdrawn and necessary action may please be taken.
Submitted most respectfully For Ramavtar Sharma (Shivangi Samdhani) A/R”
3 ITA 900/JP/2019_ M/s Siwal Builders & Developers vs ACIT 4. The ld DR has raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, we permit the assessee to withdraw his appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assesses is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd February, 2021
Sd/- Sd/- ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 22/02/2021 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- M/s Siwal Builders and Developers, Kota. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The A.C.I.T, Circle-1, Kota. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 900/JP/2019) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 4(1)
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Belathur Srinivasaiyengar Rangaiyengar… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MysoreITA 574/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
- Sanjivani Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahkari… vs ITO Ward-2, BhandaraITA 198/NAG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed27 May 2025AY 2019-20
- Kantibhai Punjyabhai Patel HUF, Surat vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(7), SuratITA 723/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed22 May 2025AY 2017-18
- Babu Thomas, Shivamogga vs Income Tax Officer, Ward -4, ShivamoggaITA 1434/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed17 Oct 2024AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026