Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 132/JP/2018
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 132/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 1999-2000 cuke Shri Ram Gopal Gupta The ITO, Vs. Prop. M/s Badri Prasad Ramgopal, Ward-1(1), 18, Clock Towar, Alwar. Alwar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABTPG9799G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Miss Shivangi Shamdhani (C.A.) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (ACIT) a lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 15/03/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 15/03/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A), Alwar dated 29.11.2017 for the assessment year 1999-2000.
The ld A/R has stated at the Bar that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has recently been accepted and Form 3 as been issued by the competent authority. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Shri Ram Gopal Gupta vs. ITO 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.