SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2-2, AJMER
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2014-15. The assessee subsequently filed a petition under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020 to settle the matter.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 1150/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 1150/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2014-15 cuke Shri Mahendra Kumar Jain, ITO, Vs. M/s Mohit Iron Store, Near Ward 2(2), Vardhman Kanta, Nehru Nagar, Ajmer Srinagar Road, Ajmer ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.:AAQPJ8753P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: (Withdrawal application filed) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Jt.CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 18/03/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement :18/03/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M.
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A), Ajmer dated 22.08.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The ld A/R has stated that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has been accepted and Form 5 has been issued on 20.07.2020 by the Designated Authority and which has been received by the assessee. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Sh. Mahendra Kumar Jain, Ajmer vs. ITO, Ward- 2(2), Ajmer 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 18/03/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026