SHRI VINAY TAMBI C/O- KHANDELWAL SHARMA & CO., CA S-2, 2ND FLOOR, ANNAPURNA CHAMBER, OPP. RAILWAY STATION POST OFFICE, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD-3(2), JAIPUR, WARD-3(2), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2013-14. The assessee later filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' which was accepted.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 746/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 746/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2013-14 cuke Sh. Vinay Tambi ITO, Vs. F-612, Trinity Toen, New Ward 3(2), Sanganer Road, Sewage Farm Jaipur Road, Jaipur ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABBPT2472P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: (Withdrawal application filed) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 12/03/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 12/03/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M.
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)- 1, Jaipur dated 05.03.2019 for the assessment year 2013-14.
The ld A/R has stated that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has been accepted and Form 3 has been issued on 26.02.2021 by the Designated Authority and which has been received by the assessee. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Sh. Vinay Tambi, Jaipur vs. ITO, Jaipur 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/03/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026