DCIT, C-6, JAIPUR vs. MOHAMMED AKHLAQ, JAIPUR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, as the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The assessee had filed an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received a certificate from the Income Tax Department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the revenue should be withdrawn as the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 187/JP/2020
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. This appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 31/12/2019 for the A.Y. 2012-13.
The hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.
An application for withdrawal of this appeal has been filed by the ld. Authorized representative of the assessee vide letter dated 18/03/2021. The contention made in the said application reads as under: “The above appeal is fixed for hearing on 19/03/2021. It is submitted that appellant filed an application in ‘VIVAD SE VISHWAS’ Scheme, 2020 on 04/07/2020. The ld PCIT, Jaipur-2 has issued
2 ITA 187/JP/2020_ DCIT Vs Mohammed Akhlaq certificate No. 228118140270121 in Form No. 3 on 27/01/2021. A copy of said certificate is enclosed herewith. In the circumstances it is prayed your honor that appellant may kindly be allowed to withdraw the appeal pending for disposal before your honor. Thanking you Yours faithfully, For B. Khosla & Co. Chartered Accountants
(Counsel for Assessee)” 4. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing Certificate No. 228118140270121 in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The ld DR has raised no objection if the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, we permit to withdraw this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3 ITA 187/JP/2020_ DCIT Vs Mohammed Akhlaq 7. In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19th March, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 19/03/2021 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- The D.C.I.T., Circle-6, Jaipur. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- Mohammed Akhlaq, Jaipur. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 187/JP/2020) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026