SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR SANCHETI 263-264, JOHARI BAZAR, JAIPUR C/O SHRI VIJAY GOYAL SHREE RAMAM, 58 SHREE GOPAL NAGAR, GOPAL PURA BYE PASS ROAD, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(1), JAIPUR, WARD-1(1), JAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' petition was accepted. The Revenue did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' to settle the matter.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 291/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 291/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2011-12 cuke Shri Rajendra Kumar Sancheti Income Tax Officer, Vs. 263-264, Johari Bazaar, Jaipur Ward 1(1), Jaipur ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGWPS7304K vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: Sh. Gulshan Agarwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Jt. CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 26/03/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 30/03/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)-1, Jaipur dated 20.12.2018 for the assessment year 2011-12.
The ld A/R has stated that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has been accepted and Form 3 has been issued on 31.01.2021 by the Designated Authority and which has been received by the assessee. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Shri Rajendra Kumar Sancheti, Jaipur vs. ITO, Ward 1(1), Jaipur 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 30/03/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026