HARIS MOHAMMAD,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to availing the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Ld. DR did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263. The assessee later applied for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 5 from the Income Tax Department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn after the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI & SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 18.03.2019, impugned herein, passed by the learned Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax -21, New Delhi u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The learned AR of the Assessee vide application dated 15.07.2022 claimed that since the Assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 5 in response to the application filed by the Assessee under the scheme, therefore, the Assessee’s appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not refute the factual position and claim of the Assessee.
Considering the request of the ld. AR for withdrawal of the appeal and Form-5 dated 29.01.2021 (Copy already on record) issued by the Department, the appeal of Assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn, hence, ordered accordingly.
In the result, Assessee’s appeal under consideration stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27/07/2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026